writing-systems-papers¶
paper-draftingWriting Systems Papers: Paragraph-Level Blueprint¶
Structural guidance for $ARGUMENTS
Relationship to Other ARIS Skills¶
- paper-write: General paper generation workflow with citation verification. This skill complements it with systems-specific structural blueprints.
- paper-slides: Conference presentation generation (Beamer+PPTX). Already covers talks — no overlap.
- paper-plan: Research outline creation. Use paper-plan first, then this skill for paragraph-level structure.
Boundary: paper-write handles the generation workflow (LaTeX output, DBLP verification, section-by-section drafting). This skill provides the structural skeleton — page budgets, paragraph roles, and writing patterns specific to systems venues.
Page Allocation: 12-Page Systems Paper¶
| Section | Pages | Key Content |
|---|---|---|
| Abstract | ~0.25 | 150–250 words, 5 sentences |
| S1 Introduction | 1.5–2 | Problem → Gap → Insight → Contributions |
| S2 Background & Motivation | 1–1.5 | Terms + Production observations |
| S3 Design | 3–4 | Architecture + Modules + Alternatives |
| S4 Implementation | 0.5–1 | Prototype, LOC, engineering |
| S5 Evaluation | 3–4 | Setup + E2E + Ablation + Scalability |
| S6 Related Work | 1 | By methodology, explicit comparison |
| S7 Conclusion | 0.5 | 3-sentence summary |
Section Blueprints¶
Abstract (5 sentences)¶
S1: Problem context and importance
S2: Gap in existing approaches
S3: Thesis — "X is better for Y in environment Z" (Irene Zhang formula)
S4: Approach summary + headline results
S5: Impact or availability
Sources: Levin & Redell — "Can you state the new idea concisely?"; Irene Zhang — "abstract cannot use terms introduced in the paper."
S1 Introduction (1.5–2 pages)¶
- Problem (~0.5p) — Domain + concrete numbers + why it matters
- Gap analysis (~0.5p) — G1–Gn: specific shortcomings with evidence
- Key insight (1 para) — Thesis: "X is better for Y in Z"
- Contributions (~0.5p) — 3–5 numbered, testable claims with §N references
Pattern: hzwer Move 1 (territory) → Move 2 (niche) → Move 3 (occupy).
S2 Background & Motivation (1–1.5 pages)¶
- Technical background (~0.5p) — Define-before-use (Gernot Heiser)
- Observations (~0.5–1p) — O1, O2, O3 from production data → design insights
S3 Design (3–4 pages)¶
- Architecture overview (~0.5p) — Diagram first (Yi Ding: "draw a picture first")
- Module details (~2–2.5p) — Per module: choice, alternatives, why
- Trade-offs (~0.5–1p) — Summary of design decisions
Rule: "Every design choice must discuss alternatives" (Irene Zhang).
S4 Implementation (0.5–1 page)¶
Language, LOC, framework, key engineering decisions. Keep concise.
S5 Evaluation (3–4 pages)¶
- Setup (~0.5p) — Hardware, baselines, workloads, metrics
- End-to-end (~1–1.5p) — X vs baselines for Y on Z
- Ablation (~1–1.5p) — Remove each component, measure impact
- Scalability (~0.5p) — Behavior at increasing scale
Three-statement rule (Irene Zhang): Every conclusion stated as: - Hypothesis (section opening) - Conclusion (section closing) - Caption (figure caption)
S6 Related Work (1 page)¶
Group by methodology. For each group: what they do, limitation, how we differ.
S7 Conclusion (0.5 page)¶
Three sentences: problem, solution, result. No new information.
Writing Patterns¶
Pattern 1: Gap Analysis¶
Enumerate G1–Gn in intro → A1–An in design → verify in evaluation. Example: Lucid (ASPLOS'23) — 5 gaps mapped to 5 answers.
Pattern 2: Observation-Driven¶
O1–O3 from production data → insights → design components. Example: GFS (arXiv 2025) — 3 observations drive 3 components.
Pattern 3: Contribution List¶
Numbered contributions in intro, each with §N cross-reference. Example: Blox (EuroSys'24) — 7 contributions; Sia (SOSP'23) — 5 contributions.
Pattern 4: Thesis Formula¶
"X is better for Y in Z" structures the entire paper. Combine with other patterns for maximum impact.
Conference Differences¶
Always verify against current CFP — rules change yearly.
| Venue | Format | Pages | Camera-Ready |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSDI | USENIX | 12 | 14 |
| NSDI | USENIX | 12 | 14 |
| SOSP | ACM SIGOPS | 12 | — |
| ASPLOS | ACM SIGPLAN | 11 | 13 |
| EuroSys | ACM | 12 | — |
Based on 2025/2026 CFPs.
Workflow¶
1. Determine venue and page limit
2. Choose writing pattern (Gap/Observation/Contribution/Thesis)
3. Allocate pages per section using the table above
4. Draft Abstract following 5-sentence template
5. Draft Introduction: Problem → Gap → Insight → Contributions
6. Draft Motivation with production observations (if available)
7. Draw architecture figure, then write Design
8. Draft Implementation (concise)
9. Draft Evaluation: setup → E2E → ablation → scalability
10. Draft Related Work by methodology groups
11. Draft Conclusion: 3 sentences
12. Run pre-submission checklist
13. Hand off to /paper-write for LaTeX generation and citation verification
Quick Self-Check¶
- Thesis follows "X is better for Y in Z"
- 3–5 numbered contributions with §N references
- Design discusses alternatives for every major choice
- Eval conclusions stated 3 times (hypothesis, result, caption)
- Related work grouped by methodology
- Page budget within venue limits
- No fabricated observations, traces, or results
- All citations verified (delegate to /paper-write)
Academic Integrity¶
- Never fabricate observations, traces, or experimental results
- Never generate citations from memory — use /paper-write citation workflow
- Disclose LLM use per venue policy
- This blueprint provides structural guidance, not copy-paste text
Authoritative Sources¶
- Levin & Redell — "How (and How Not) to Write a Good Systems Paper" (USENIX)
- Irene Zhang — "Hints on how to write an SOSP paper"
- Gernot Heiser — Style Guide + Paper Writing Talk
- Timothy Roscoe — "Writing reviews for systems conferences"
- Yi Ding — "How to write good systems papers?"
- hzwer & DingXiaoH — WritingAIPaper (GitHub)