Social Science Replicability Infrastructure¶
external · status: active · focus: replication · discipline: social-sciences · started: 2025
Project page: https://github.com/benjamin-kohler/social_science_replicability
Licence: none
No licence declared
The repository declares no licence, so its code cannot be reused, modified or redistributed without the maintainer's permission. RISE describes and links to the project; nothing from it is reproduced here.
Source: projects/landscape/social-science-replicability.yml
Positioning¶
Infrastructure aimed at the replication stage of the RISE pipeline: given a published paper, attempt to reproduce its empirical results in an automated or semi-automated fashion. Sits squarely in the replication block of the RISE diagram.
Distinctive contribution¶
Focuses the agentic-research conversation on replication of existing papers rather than generation of new ones — a complementary axis to the AI-scientist line.
Evaluation scores¶
| Dimension | Score (0–3) | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Lifecycle coverage | 1 | Four stages, all in the replication arc; does not cover ideation/drafting. |
| Autonomy level | 2 | Supervised: user supplies target, system attempts replication. |
| Architectural transparency | 2 | Open source; architecture documented in README; prompts visible. |
| Inputs supported | 2 | Accepts target paper + target dataset; integrates external sources. |
| Outputs / reproducibility | 2 | Reports + code persisted; reproducibility-by-design as a stated goal. |
| Internal evaluation | 2 | Systematic benchmark across 48 papers with human-verified reproducibility, run against 4 agent scaffolds and 4 LLMs, with root-cause analysis of failures; paper now forthcoming at EMNLP 2026 but not yet third-party replicated. |
| Openness | 3 | Open source under permissive license. |
| Maturity / traction | 1 | Active prototype; single-developer-led; 29 stars, 7 forks, 42 commits, most recent 2026-08-31; no further commits since. |
| Cross-family policy | 0 | Single-LLM-family pipeline; methodology extractor + replicator within one family. |
| Runtime assurance | 2 | Code-execution + output-match comparison against target paper is the runtime assurance. |
| Cross-platform portability | 1 | Python-CLI tool; back-end LLM swappable but not multi-IDE. |
Scored on 2026-10-01. See the evaluation rubric.
Tags¶
Pipeline stages: replication data-acquisition data-analysis code-generation
Architectural features: tool-use dag-orchestration artifact-versioning
Inputs: target-paper target-dataset
Outputs: replication-report code comparison-tables
Data sources: target-paper-data
Knowledge sources: target-paper
Limitations¶
- Success rate depends heavily on availability of target paper's data + code.
- The 48-paper benchmark (4 scaffolds x 4 LLMs) lives in the companion paper, not as a runnable harness in this repo; success varies substantially by model, scaffold and paper.
Related projects in this catalog¶
Papers describing this project¶
- Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results — Köhler, B., Zollikofer, D., Einsiedler, A., Hoyle, A., Ash, E. (2026). arXiv (forthcoming at EMNLP 2026). arXiv:2604.21965
Related references (literature catalog)¶
- Kohler, B. et al. (2026). Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results
kohler2026agenticreproduction