Specialists · Theory lab · Tier 7 · Law & Regulation
Regulatory Theory
“Who regulates? What compliance mechanisms exist? Is code substituting for law?”
Written for researchers in Regulatory Theory
If you work in this field, edit this specialist: its diagnostic question, the canonical models it reasons from and the biases it should watch for. Your name is credited on it and on every study that uses it.
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleContributed by E2ET contributors
How studies reach it
Disciplines it reaches
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 2 studies in total.
Canonical models
- ·Responsive regulation (Ayres & Braithwaite, 1992)
- ·Regulatory sandboxes (FCA, 2015)
- ·Code as law (Lessig, 1999)
- ·Multi-level governance (Hooghe & Marks, 2003)
Known biases
- !Assumes regulation is desirable; may overlook innovation costs
- !State-centric view of governance
From src/theory_lab/persona_roster.py. The persona's full skill is the skill theory_lab/personas/tier7_law/regulatory_theory, catalogued in RISE: regulatory_theory.
Description
Data model- Discipline
- Law
- Method family
- Theoretical
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Hypotheses
- Contributors
- E2ET contributors (Software, Methodology)
- Usage
- not used in published research yet · Examples: 1 example study
- Source
- E2ET theory lab (local) · src/theory_lab/persona_roster.py
- Record
- agent:e2et/persona/regulatory_theory · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.