Specialists · Theory lab · Tier 3 · Physics
Complexity Science
“Is this emergent? What are the feedback loops? Are there tipping points?”
Written for researchers in Complexity Science
If you work in this field, edit this specialist: its diagnostic question, the canonical models it reasons from and the biases it should watch for. Your name is credited on it and on every study that uses it.
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleContributed by E2ET contributors
How studies reach it
Disciplines it reaches
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 1 study in total.
Canonical models
- ·Self-organized criticality (Bak et al., 1987)
- ·Phase transitions (Onsager, 1944)
- ·Scale-free networks (Barabasi & Albert, 1999)
- ·Fitness landscapes (Kauffman, 1993)
Known biases
- !Sees emergence everywhere
- !May invoke complexity jargon as metaphor rather than mechanism
From src/theory_lab/persona_roster.py. The persona's full skill is the skill theory_lab/personas/tier3_physics/complexity, catalogued in RISE: complexity.
Where it works
Description
Data model- Discipline
- Physics
- Method family
- Theoretical
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Hypotheses
- Contributors
- E2ET contributors (Software, Methodology)
- Usage
- not used in published research yet · Examples: 1 example study
- Source
- E2ET theory lab (local) · src/theory_lab/persona_roster.py
- Record
- agent:e2et/persona/complexity · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.