External pipelines · RISE project catalogue
Coarse (coarse.ink)
A web-based AI peer-review service: users upload academic papers (up to 50 MB) and receive AI-generated referee reports with 20+ detailed comments. Operates in two modes — web-based using user-supplied OpenRouter API keys, or local processing via Claude Code / Codex / Gemini CLI subscriptions. Sits squarely in the referee-simulation stage of the RISE pipeline.
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleContributed by coarse.ink team
How studies reach it
No published study reaches it yet.
Disciplines it reaches
No study reaches it yet.
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who contributed what. 0 studies in total.
What it does
Open-source (MIT) and explicitly anti-commercial in framing — "Academic peer review runs on unpaid academic labor. Others decided to make a business out of that. We didn't like that." The site reports a blind self-evaluation against refine.ink, Stanford Agentic Reviewer, and reviewer3.com claiming higher coverage, specificity, and depth. Privacy-by-design: API keys remain in the user's browser tab and clear on close.
- Focus
- review
- Inputs
- submitted-paper-pdf, reviewer-focus-note
- Outputs
- referee-report
- Architecture
- tool-use, human-in-loop
- Maintained by
- coarse.ink team
- Started
- 2026
Description
Data model- Discipline
- General
- Method family
- not specified
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Review
- Contributors
- coarse.ink team
- Usage
- not used in published research yet
- Source
- RISE project catalogue · projects/landscape · @4c17bae
- Record
- pipeline:coarse-ink · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.
Bring it into the standard
A pipeline built outside E2ER can meet the standard by describing its steps as a template, attaching the floor of checks and publishing evaluation records. Its authors keep ownership and credit.